Open 0pdd opened 3 weeks ago
@0pdd thanks for the report, here is a feedback:
The todo seems to be asking for adding support of @ExtendsWith from JUnit in order to pass expected as test parameter. However, the message is not very clear about the specific problem or issue that needs to be addressed. It would be more helpful if the todo message provides more context or details about the problem, such as why this change is needed or what benefits it would bring to the codebase.
The todo also mentions about using extensions to pass expected as parameters into test. It would be useful to clarify if the author is referring to any specific type of extension or if they are asking for a new extension to be developed. Additionally, it would be helpful to know if there are any existing extensions that can be considered for this purpose.
The todo targets a specific issue (#41) and estimates the time needed to complete the task (60 minutes). However, it would be better to have a more descriptive title for the issue, which clearly indicates the purpose or goal of the task. This will make it easier for other contributors to understand the context and prioritize the task accordingly.
Please fix the bug report in order it to get resolved faster.
Analyzed with Phind/Phind-CodeLlama-34B-v2
@0pdd thanks for the report, here is a feedback: * The todo seems to be asking for adding support of...
I see you're talking to me, but I can't reply since I'm not a chat bot.
The puzzle
41-8e9aa4b2
from #41 has to be resolved:https://github.com/h1alexbel/fakehub/blob/fe9cf78769e95b1d2a27a298988922a95950044b/server/src/report/latex.rs#L53-L56
The puzzle was created by @h1alexbel on 26-Jun-24.
Estimate: 60 minutes, role: DEV.
If you have any technical questions, don't ask me, submit new tickets instead. The task will be \"done\" when the problem is fixed and the text of the puzzle is removed from the source code. Here is more about PDD and about me.