storage.rs:59-62: Implement #xml function in Storage....

[0pdd]

The puzzle 17-1a69e44f from #17 has to be resolved:

https://github.com/h1alexbel/fakehub/blob/31636e6ff542ff1317c28ae7bbac232572a06a30/server/src/xml/storage.rs#L59-L62

The puzzle was created by @h1alexbel on 11-Jul-24.

Estimate: 35 minutes, role: DEV.

If you have any technical questions, don't ask me, submit new tickets instead. The task will be \"done\" when the problem is fixed and the text of the puzzle is removed from the source code. Here is more about PDD and about me.

[github-actions[bot]]

@0pdd thanks for the report, here is a feedback:

• The todo message mentions implementing the #xml function, however, it does not specify what the function should do. It is unclear what kind of XML representation the function should return. The message should provide more details about the expected XML structure or data.
• The todo message asks to make the function thread-safe but does not provide any guidance on how to achieve this. The message could suggest using synchronization primitives, such as Mutex, to ensure that the function can be safely called concurrently.
• The todo message reminds to create unit tests for the #xml function but does not give any specific test scenarios. The message should list down some example test scenarios that should be covered by the tests, such as empty storage, storage with initial content, and storage with modified content.

Please fix the bug report in order it to get resolved faster. Analyzed with Phind/Phind-CodeLlama-34B-v2

[0pdd]

@0pdd thanks for the report, here is a feedback: * The todo message mentions implementing the #xml...

I see you're talking to me, but I can't reply since I'm not a chat bot.

[0pdd]

@0pdd 2 puzzles #98, #99 are still not solved.

[0pdd]

@0pdd all 2 puzzles are solved here: #98, #99.