To my knowledge, it uses a more complete algorithm for reliably reading OPUS files than brukeropusreader. Also, it is not clear that brukeropusreader is still being maintained:
If there is interest in switching, I could assist if needed. My package returns a custom OPUSFile class rather than a simple dictionary, but all the information (and more) is there. One thing I have been considering is writing a compatibility function for reading an opus file and returning the same dict format that brukeropusreader returns. It wouldn't have all the features of my OPUSFile class, but it would make transitioning relatively trivial for projects that already use brukeropusreader. Let me know if you are interested.
I have recently released an open-source package that can read Bruker OPUS files called
brukeropus:https://github.com/joshduran/brukeropus
To my knowledge, it uses a more complete algorithm for reliably reading OPUS files than
brukeropusreader. Also, it is not clear thatbrukeropusreaderis still being maintained:https://github.com/qedsoftware/brukeropusreader/issues/23
If there is interest in switching, I could assist if needed. My package returns a custom
OPUSFileclass rather than a simple dictionary, but all the information (and more) is there. One thing I have been considering is writing a compatibility function for reading an opus file and returning the same dict format thatbrukeropusreaderreturns. It wouldn't have all the features of myOPUSFileclass, but it would make transitioning relatively trivial for projects that already usebrukeropusreader. Let me know if you are interested.