Closed anitacaron closed 5 months ago
Melek-C
commented
6 months ago @anitacaron After discussing this issue with @abenkahla we found that in the previous version the terms belonging to "Rrelationship" annotation were modified as "subclass_of" and the "country_of_residence" was removed in the new version. Maybe something went wrong during the update or the data transfer from webprotégé to protégé. How we should process to fix this issue.
Melek-C
commented
6 months ago Reminder!
anitacaron
commented
6 months ago @Melek-C @abenkahla Sorry for the late reply on this. Do you still have the link to the ontology in the webprotege? Can I have access?
Melek-C
commented
6 months ago Hi @anitacaron @abenkahla just shared with you the access to the webprotege AfPO.
anitacaron
commented
5 months ago After meeting today, we decided:
As discussed in our last meeting, here's the list of inconsistencies in population_group and country of origin. For example, in Zambia, three populations (Bantu Central, British diaspora and Pygmy Central) define it as a country of origin, but they are not in Zambia as a population group. The difference we saw in direct subclass and subclasses is that all subclasses of these three classes infer to have Zambia as the country of origin.