Config Flow: Implementation of Config Flow | Thread/Discussion & Documentation

[robigan]

Hello World, summer holidays have started for me, and I've decided to work on implementing the config_flow.py into the vimar custom component.

Why does this issue exist? This issue exists to discuss the way config_flow.py should be implemented and to document any interesting findings along the way. Where's the work on this feature? The work on this feature can be found on my fork of the repo

[h4de5]

hi - there is a bigger change coming up here - config flow included: https://github.com/h4de5/home-assistant-vimar/tree/room_integrations the problem is, that i do not have enough time to test it locally at the moment.

[robigan]

hi - there is a bigger change coming up here - config flow included: https://github.com/h4de5/home-assistant-vimar/tree/room_integrations the problem is, that i do not have enough time to test it locally at the moment.

Oh huh, I didn't notice, lol. I'll try integrating it into there. Also what exactly does the room_integrations branch feature exactly? Cus I don't recall there being support for rooms, do u mean integrating the "ambienti" feature into hass rooms?

[h4de5]

each vimar entity (switch, light, cover etc) is located in a room. currently this is just visible through the unique_id/friendly name. with this change rooms frim vimar will show up in HA and can be easier used for automations

[robigan]

each vimar entity (switch, light, cover etc) is located in a room. currently this is just visible through the unique_id/friendly name. with this change rooms frim vimar will show up in HA and can be easier used for automations

Right, so I assume you mean the feature "ambienti" (Italian for ambient, but is usually also interpreted as areas/rooms). My only issue is that what if I wish not to implement the rooms found in the vimar project? For example my room mappings in HA are different than the ones in Vimar and wish to keep it that way. Point being is have you already implemented this some how or should I look into making a PR for such a thing?

[h4de5]

to make sure that there are options for users who do not want to change things, is part of the testing.

[h4de5]

closed via #48