The "wraps" keyword allows us to specify that a mock wraps another object,
delegating method calls to that object. Per the documentation, the delegation
can be overridden by specifying a "return_value" for that method on the mock as
usual.
On the other hand, "side_effect", among other things, allows us to specify a
callable to generate the return value instead of specifying it explicitly.
Each of these features are very useful, and indispensable for some cases. There
are, of course, some cases where using _both_ would be very handy.
Unfortunately, this is not currently supported. The "side_effect" attribute is
currently ignored for method calls on Mock objects using "wraps". It should be
supported just as "return_value" is.
wraps and side_effect: two great tastes that taste great together!
Original issue reported on code.google.com by m...@nerone.org on 13 May 2015 at 10:40
Original issue reported on code.google.com by
m...@nerone.org
on 13 May 2015 at 10:40