Open ekilmer opened 2 years ago
It was implemented rather quickly and I didn't want to release it. One open issue was that it wasn't testing whether paths where pointing outside the sysroot, and I didn't want to add realpath
type of functions to libtree. Maybe I shouldn't care about going outside the sysroot, since libtree is just a simple read-only utility.
FWIW, libtree barely uses any memory, so it might as well work on not so powerful devices. Otherwise you could maybe use bwrap
or some other tool to chroot inside your environment and run a statically compiled libtree
there.
Understood! Thank you for the details.
I will look into bwrap
.
When I can emulate or access the device in question, I have done as you suggested and statically compiled libtree
to run within the environment, which works very well!
I'm unsure if you want to leave this issue open or close, so feel free to close it if you wish.
Hello, I am wondering more about why the
--sysroot
option was removed (https://github.com/haampie/libtree/commit/05ec3ac5e8f65083fd25fccb0380c11e30d63e89)?My use-case is applying libtree to binaries/libraries from extracted firmware image filesystems where I might not be able to compile and run libtree on the device, and this feature would be very nice to have.
I implemented support (also rudimentary) for this myself before I noticed the aforementioned commit that reverted this functionality.
Thank you!