Closed Mitochondria7 closed 10 months ago
Which command are you using? It currently doesn't support certain special tokens e.g. which requires bitworkr.
Which command are you using? It currently doesn't support certain special tokens e.g. which requires bitworkr. what do you mean by bitworkr? bitwork for realm?
I was testing it on sophon, which is a token that has same bitwork difficulty as quark. Here is my command: atomicalsir --ticker sophon --max-fee 40 --rust-engine /my atomical-JS wallet path.
The tx id is: 000000adc70f392c8710bb292cfe17c54a23a88f8d4129631a3e13ad6348de53, you could see reveal tx seems to be successfully delivered. but that was considered as regular UTXO when I check my address balance
I was testing it on sophon, which is a token that has same bitwork difficulty as quark. Here is my command: atomicalsir --ticker sophon --max-fee 40 --rust-engine /my atomical-JS wallet path.
The tx id is: 000000adc70f392c8710bb292cfe17c54a23a88f8d4129631a3e13ad6348de53, you could see reveal tx seems to be successfully delivered. but that was considered as regular UTXO when I check my address balance
Bitworkr of sophon is "6238", but rust-engine does not support bitworkr currently.
I was testing it on sophon, which is a token that has same bitwork difficulty as quark. Here is my command: atomicalsir --ticker sophon --max-fee 40 --rust-engine /my atomical-JS wallet path. The tx id is: 000000adc70f392c8710bb292cfe17c54a23a88f8d4129631a3e13ad6348de53, you could see reveal tx seems to be successfully delivered. but that was considered as regular UTXO when I check my address balance
Bitworkr of sophon is "6238", but rust-engine does not support bitworkr currently.
Thanks for the explanation! this might be a dumb question, bitworkr stands for reveal bitwork? I didn't realize it exist previously. Just did some quick search, indeed quark didn't require bitworkr, then it make senses that rust-engine can work on it.
bitworkr stands for reveal bitwork?
Yes.
I will add bitworkr feature later.
I just did a test using latest code (0.1.9) . The mint is very fast, however, after confirmation on chain, it seems the atomicals index didn't recognize the successful mint received in primary wallet as atomicals. It considers it as normal UTXO. How can I fix this? Thanks