Questions and comments that pop up when reading through the wiki and figma audit files:
Are there any trends to observe between team sizes and figma and/or wiki completeness?
Do you notice a correlation between project length and wiki or figma completeness?
Is there a difference to observe with regards to the aims/goals/nature of the individual projects?
You can measure completeness from the Figma file in % and see if that overlaps with the % of completeness of the Wiki audit file.
Example of reporting quantitative results: Of all 19 projects that have a Figma file (cleaning stage 1), only 5 had a table of content: 26%. Excluding our own Figma (cleaning stage 2), only 4 out of 18, which is 22%. Or put otherwise, only 2 out of 10 projects provided a table of content on their Figma files.
For one project 23 out of 40 people can edit the Figma file: 58% or almost 6 out of 10 team members/at least 5 out of 10 team members can edit the Figma file.
A more general comments:
In the future, if there are more projects or teams you need to research you can code the yes/no measurement differently. By e.g. assigning 0 for no and 1 for yes. Then you can calculate the numbers more quickly once you need to analyze them.
Overview
Weekly meeting to review, make decisions, and ask questions about work that is completed and upcoming for the Design Systems UI/UX team
Action Items
Resources/Instructions
Zoom Link Figma Audit file Wiki Audit Figjam for insights brainstorming