hackforla / food-oasis

Repository for the current redevelopment of the Food Oasis Los Angeles website
https://foodoasis.la
GNU General Public License v2.0
73 stars 51 forks source link

Review and update personas #885

Closed ktjnyc closed 3 years ago

ktjnyc commented 3 years ago

Dependencies

955

Overview

We need to update our personas so that we are building the tools/pages that match our users.

Action Items

Resources/Instructions

Hack for LA Guide for personas/user stories FOLA user stories/personas USC Food Insecurity Report Current User Persona Research Draft Personas

ktjnyc commented 3 years ago

I created a copy of the personas so that we can provide comments

ktjnyc commented 3 years ago

Looks like what was linked previously was the guide on creating the user personas.

Current personas exist here - https://github.com/hackforla/food-oasis/wiki/User-Stories

ktjnyc commented 3 years ago

Bryan asked Thy to provide some additional guidance from her experience.

fancyham commented 3 years ago

@wanderingspoon

wanderingspoon commented 3 years ago

I’m currently reading and aggregating research addressing food insecurity and mobile tech use among vulnerable communities in CA.

wanderingspoon commented 3 years ago

Here's a document that brings together demographic information about food insecure households in California and US, along with some studies on visitors to food pantries and mobile tech use in low-income communities.

I think we can use the data to create solid personas for now. These will ideally be validated later for FOLA's specific objectives, of course, but I think they can still be helpful in the meantime for design and development teams.

For those not working on the personas proper, I recommend reading Key Points, pp. 1-2. The rest is information that we'll use to flesh out personas.

Food Insecurity & Mobile Tech Use Among Low-Income Households: Distillation of Published Research

@nkiwan

wanderingspoon commented 3 years ago

How will personas fit into larger workflow?

Provisional action items, depending on discussion with larger team:

Upon completion, potential next steps, depending on team needs

@nkiwan @ktjnyc @fancyham

wanderingspoon commented 3 years ago

Could we add a parallel issue? @ktjnyc

It would be ideal if, while Natalie and I work on the personas, that another team is coming up with the criteria which will be used for selecting and prioritizing them later, after we present them to all stakeholders. I would prefer strongly that those criteria are established and communicated out before we present. Or at least, very close together in time. @fancyham

Natalie and I will confer soon to clarify our soonest delivery date for the personas. We can also delay the presentation as needed to sync with creating the criteria. @nkiwan

wanderingspoon commented 3 years ago

Current persona team: Natalie Kwan, Thy Tran

Working Task List

PHASE 1

wanderingspoon commented 3 years ago

Not sure how to create dependencies? In order to ensure that we can later select and prioritize personas successfully.

Natalie and I will not need these to deliver the personas. But they're critical for progress afterward.

@fancyham @ktjnyc

ktjnyc commented 3 years ago

@wanderingspoon I'll create the parallel issue and link it here under dependencies at the top.

nkiwan commented 3 years ago

Persona Task List Update

Personas have been assigned Expected timeline for deliverables: 4-6 weeks

Next steps are to build out assigned personas (with qualitative data from interviews if possible) and check in at weekly stand-ups.

@wanderingspoon

wanderingspoon commented 3 years ago

Created script for 20-30 informational interview for professionals working with food insecure populations. Interviewed national director of food insecurity at federal gov't agency.

wanderingspoon commented 3 years ago

Natalie and I are leaning toward group profiles (e.g. single parents, seniors, case managers) instead of individual personas (e.g. named, fictionalized). To us, the latter feel fragile, forced and less useful as we have not conducted user research for the details. Group profiles, while not conventional user personas, seem more robust as they'll be data-driven or supported by secondary sources.

We presented examples of both and asked the group about their preferences. After short discussion, consensus settled on group profiles. Later, once we have enough research on actual users, we can create specific, named personas.

Examples of group profiles vs. individual personas

@nkiwan

wanderingspoon commented 3 years ago

Some delay in presenting, as we lost files during the May 31 bug with Google Drive and still have not retrieved more recent notes during May.

Have decided to move forward with documents from April.

fancyham commented 3 years ago

The current thinking on this (with feedback from @wanderingspoon) is that since we haven't done new research, that the document mentioned above (linked again below) should give us the best understanding of our users without the risk of making things up from whole cloth, or taking from news or publicity pieces (where stories are used to illustrate a larger narrative).

Please refer to this document to better understand food seekers in the Los Angeles area: Food Insecurity & Mobile Tech Use Among Low-Income Households: Distillation of Published Research

A future project would be to interview actual food seekers, people helping food seekers, which can optionally be used to create accurate, more detailed personas, if that's useful to the team.