Coverage data has little insight on files that weren't used in testing, giving out silly result of 93% covered when it's closed to 7% covered.
One way to fix it is to expand cobertura.xml with all the missing files from relevant subdir. Those should not include lines with comments or empty lines; actual coverage is even more small, but that should give a reasonable approximation.
Coverage data has little insight on files that weren't used in testing, giving out silly result of 93% covered when it's closed to 7% covered.
One way to fix it is to expand cobertura.xml with all the missing files from relevant subdir. Those should not include lines with comments or empty lines; actual coverage is even more small, but that should give a reasonable approximation.