Closed znmeb closed 7 years ago
Here's a little more research on the PostgreSQL 9.5 vs. 9.6:
Feature matrix: https://www.postgresql.org/about/featurematrix/ The bottom line is for large problems 9.6 has better performance and 9.6 has a few more analytical features inside the database engine. I'd be surprised if anything we do will show a significant improvement.
Other tradeoffs:
I've got PgAdmin 4 / PostgreSQL 9.6 / PostGIS 2.3 set up on my workstation and on my laptop and will be getting up to speed on them so if we do go that route I'll be ready.
I've got two open issues on the laptop scripts for this pending the decision. It's about half a day to implement if we go with 9.6; no work at all if we go with 9.5.
In the interest of simply making an initial decision, can we go with 9.5? I don't think it's a terrible idea to be one point release behind, and since it seems all around easier to stick with 9.5, how about we just do that? We can always consider moving to (or creating a special vagrant box for etc...) 9.6 if we find a compelling reason.
yep ... we're going with 9.5 and PostGIS 2.2. Closing the issue.
PostgreSQL 9.6.1 is now the latest stable version (https://www.postgresql.org/). However, the default in Ubuntu 16.04 LTS "Xenial Xerus" is 9.5. I haven't looked at the differences yet. In any event between Data Architecture and the Database class we need to choose one or the other.
Personally I'd choose 9.6 and modify our install scripts to get that version. But I can live with 9.5 if that's what people want.