haco20292 / dex2jar

Automatically exported from code.google.com/p/dex2jar
0 stars 0 forks source link

DexException: Not support Opcode :0x06=MOVE_WIDE_16 #49

Closed GoogleCodeExporter closed 9 years ago

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago
What steps will reproduce the problem?
1. Try to run dex2jar SNAPSHOT 0.0.7.9 on attached classes.dex

What is the expected output? What do you see instead?

Correctly converted jar is expected. Instead I see the following stacktraces:

Caused by: com.googlecode.dex2jar.DexException: while accept 
method:[Lcom/psmsapp/android/psms/RegisterResults;.checkError1()Ljava/lang/Strin
g;]
 at com.googlecode.dex2jar.reader.DexFileReader.acceptMethod (DexFileReader.java:550)
    com.googlecode.dex2jar.reader.DexFileReader.acceptClass (DexFileReader.java:323)
    com.googlecode.dex2jar.reader.DexFileReader.accept (DexFileReader.java:205)
    com.googlecode.dex2jar.v3.Main.doData (Main.java:105)
...
Caused by: com.googlecode.dex2jar.DexException: while accept code in 
method:[Lcom/psmsapp/android/psms/RegisterResults;.checkError1()Ljava/lang/Strin
g;]
 at com.googlecode.dex2jar.reader.DexFileReader.acceptMethod (DexFileReader.java:540)
    com.googlecode.dex2jar.reader.DexFileReader.acceptClass (DexFileReader.java:323)
    com.googlecode.dex2jar.reader.DexFileReader.accept (DexFileReader.java:205)
    com.googlecode.dex2jar.v3.Main.doData (Main.java:105)
...
Caused by: com.googlecode.dex2jar.DexException: Not support Opcode 
:0x06=MOVE_WIDE_16 @[0x001c] at 
com.googlecode.dex2jar.reader.DexCodeReader.accept (DexCodeReader.java:463)
    com.googlecode.dex2jar.reader.DexFileReader.acceptMethod (DexFileReader.java:538)
    com.googlecode.dex2jar.reader.DexFileReader.acceptClass (DexFileReader.java:323)
    com.googlecode.dex2jar.reader.DexFileReader.accept (DexFileReader.java:205)
    com.googlecode.dex2jar.v3.Main.doData (Main.java:105)

What version of the product are you using? On what operating system?
Snapshot 0.0.7.9, Windows XP, Java 1.6_24

Thanks for your great work!

Original issue reported on code.google.com by steffen....@gmail.com on 30 Mar 2011 at 8:34

Attachments: