Closed joaomcteixeira closed 1 year ago
I am checking and they are the same as xplor
. One difference is that xplor
(according to here) has HB2/HB1 swapped with 1HB/2HB with the other nomenclatures. Did you know anything about this for CNS
?
Another important change is:
! CNS v1.3 (27-Feb-10): changed OT1, OT2 to O, OXT, respectively
. xplor
keeps OT1
and OT2
.
I think this is it. tests okay in py27 and py38. @JoaoRodrigues have your say.
A user from the forum is requesting this tool -> https://ask.bioexcel.eu/t/prodigy-fails-to-calculate-binding-energy-of-protein-protein-complex/3420/3
I think is it's a useful tool and we should merge it soon.
I'm gonna go ahead and close this since we discussed online that this falls a little out of the scope of the tools and requires a lot of maintenance (all the conversion schemes, etc need to be maintained).
Follows discussion on #113
For now, adds two conversion tables between:
The input
pdb
atom name format is guessed on the fly, hence there is a bit of computation penalty.TODO:
implement XPLORN-terminal Hs, also PROhistidinesOT1
like atoms.What are your thoughts?
Still, I think #113 is a valuable tool.