Closed rvanasa closed 4 years ago
Hi @rvanasa , thanks for the contribution!
Makes sense indeed. Would you mind fixing that flake8 issue that is breaking the tests?
Merging #61 into master will decrease coverage by
0.04%
. The diff coverage is33.33%
.
@@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #61 +/- ##
==========================================
- Coverage 81.74% 81.69% -0.05%
==========================================
Files 44 44
Lines 3538 3540 +2
Branches 743 744 +1
==========================================
Hits 2892 2892
- Misses 456 457 +1
- Partials 190 191 +1
Impacted Files | Coverage Δ | |
---|---|---|
pdbtools/pdb_reres.py | 85.71% <33.33%> (-1.93%) |
:arrow_down: |
Continue to review full report at Codecov.
Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact)
,ø = not affected
,? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 061e1b7...d017f16. Read the comment docs.
Merged. Thank you again!
Since large ensembles tend to surpass 9999 overall residues, I tweaked
pdb_reres
so that the numbering scheme will reset between models. Sincepdb_reatom
already does this for each model, this would also help improve consistency between scripts.