Open rancheng opened 5 years ago
Thanks for your contribution! I'm currently using this lib to dump the graph data into xml and load with boost, but seems like these two formats are inconsistant:
part of xml wrote with pygraphml
<?xml version="1.0" ?> <graphml> <key attr.name="label" attr.type="string" id="label"/> <graph edgedefault="directed" id=""> <node id="v_000000001"/> <node id="v_000000040"/>
But when I try with boost, their file looks like this:
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?> <graphml xmlns="http://graphml.graphdrawing.org/xmlns" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://graphml.graphdrawing.org/xmlns http://graphml.graphdrawing.org/xmlns/1.0/graphml.xsd"> <key id="key0" for="edge" attr.name="edge_name" attr.type="string" /> <key id="key1" for="node" attr.name="vertex_name" attr.type="string" /> <graph id="G" edgedefault="undirected" parse.nodeids="free" parse.edgeids="canonical" parse.order="nodesfirst"> <node id="n0"> <data key="key1">v_000000000</data> </node> <node id="n1"> <data key="key1">v_000000001</data> </node>
Is there any plan for support boost favorable format?
If not, I have wrote a simple loader that read csv files into boost graphML xml:
xml
write_graphml.cpp
Thanks for your contribution! I'm currently using this lib to dump the graph data into xml and load with boost, but seems like these two formats are inconsistant:
part of xml wrote with pygraphml
But when I try with boost, their file looks like this:
Is there any plan for support boost favorable format?