When measuring the sphere-fitted curvature, the user needs to provide a radius. For beginners it's hard to guess a good value for this. As an attempt I added percentages of average-size as potential way for setting radii. See example notebook. This leads to radii that are sample dependent, which might be a bad idea, e.g. for inter-sample-comparison.
I was wondering if it makes sense to measure curvature on a order-of-magnitude basis. We could add here a block like this:
When measuring the sphere-fitted curvature, the user needs to provide a radius. For beginners it's hard to guess a good value for this. As an attempt I added percentages of average-size as potential way for setting radii. See example notebook. This leads to radii that are sample dependent, which might be a bad idea, e.g. for inter-sample-comparison.
I was wondering if it makes sense to measure curvature on a order-of-magnitude basis. We could add here a block like this:
... but I'm not sure if this makes sense and/or if there is a better (naming) scheme.
@jo-mueller What do you think?