BinLiu-NOAA
commented
3 months ago For the HAFS application level regression tests, please help to cover the following platforms, respectively.
- WCOSS2: @LinZhu-NOAA
- Jet: @BinLiu-NOAA
- Hera: @BijuThomas-NOAA
- Orion: @nriveratorres-NOAA
- Hercules: @ChuankaiWang-NOAA
Please feel free to let us know if you are not available to conduct the RTs, we can try to ask others to run to speed up this PR. Much appreciated! Thanks!
git clone -b feature/hafsv2_merge --recursive https://github.com/hafs-community/HAFS.git ./
BijuThomas-NOAA
nriveratorres-NOAA
LinZhu-NOAA
ChuankaiWang-NOAA
Description of changes
Bring in the HAFSv2 related developments back to HAFS develop branch. More details about HAFSv2 upgrade can be found: doc/Release_Notes.hafs.v2.0.0.md
Issues addressed (optional)
If this PR addresses one or more issues, please provide link(s) to the issue(s) here.
Contributors (optional)
If others worked on this PR besides the author, please include their user names here (using @Mention if possible). The UFS Hurricane Application Team.
Tests conducted
What testing has been conducted on the PR thus far? Describe the nature of any scientific or technical tests, including relevant details about the configuration(s) (e.g., cold versus warm start, number of cycles, forecast length, whether data assimilation was performed, etc). What platform(s) were used for testing?
Three year retrospective tests conducted during HAFSv2 testing and evaluation process. Technical testing conducted with this latest feature/hafsv2_merge branch.
Application-level regression test status
Running the HAFS application-level regression tests is currently performed by code reviewers after the developer creates the initial PR. As regression tests are conducted, the testers should use the checklist below to indicate successful regression tests. You may add other tests as needed. If a test fails, do not check the box. Instead, describe the failure in the PR comments, noting the platform where the test failed.