Open chrismessenger opened 7 years ago
We do really well on the G&H mass distribution and less so on the astrophysical or metric based version.
Is this because the G&H distribution is truncated at a maximum component mass rather than a maximum total mass.
The triangle of masses is a very different shape and we probe far higher/lower mass ratios. Is this the problem?
We do really well on the G&H mass distribution and less so on the astrophysical or metric based version.
Is this because the G&H distribution is truncated at a maximum component mass rather than a maximum total mass.
The triangle of masses is a very different shape and we probe far higher/lower mass ratios. Is this the problem?