codecov[bot]
commented
4 months ago Codecov Report
All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests :white_check_mark:
Comparison is base (
aeb062f) 96.59% compared to head (25851e5) 96.59%.
Additional details and impacted files
```diff @@ Coverage Diff @@ ## main #416 +/- ## ======================================= Coverage 96.59% 96.59% ======================================= Files 9 9 Lines 4987 4987 Branches 1190 1190 ======================================= Hits 4817 4817 Misses 97 97 Partials 73 73 ``` | [Flag](https://app.codecov.io/gh/hainegroup/oceanspy/pull/416/flags?src=pr&el=flags&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=hainegroup) | Coverage Δ | | |---|---|---| | [unittests](https://app.codecov.io/gh/hainegroup/oceanspy/pull/416/flags?src=pr&el=flag&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=hainegroup) | `96.59% <ø> (ø)` | | Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. [Click here](https://docs.codecov.io/docs/carryforward-flags?utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=hainegroup#carryforward-flags-in-the-pull-request-comment) to find out more.:umbrella: View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
:loudspeaker: Have feedback on the report? Share it here.
See #415 and #413
while I look at rewriting the catalog entries in a way that is compatible with intake V2