Open yachenhu opened 5 years ago
Hi,
I have run svtype, svtyper-sso and svtools genotype on the same dataset. I found the variants with GT of ./. had discrepant values in other genotype fields.
svtype
svtyper-sso
svtools genotype
svtools genotype: GT ./. svtyper-sso: GT:GQ:SQ:GL:DP:RO:AO:QR:QA:RS:AS:ASC:RP:AP:AB ./.:.:.:.:0:0:0:0:0:0:0:0:0:0:. svtyper: GT:GQ:SQ:GL:DP:RO:AO:QR:QA:RS:AS:ASC:RP:AP:AB ./.:.:.:-1344,-435,-2711:4252:3522:729:3522:729:3522:729:0:0:0:0.17
It shows that only the svtyper has a valid output, while it spent a dramatically long time to calculate it, says 10-20 folds than the other two.
svtyper
I wonder what happened here and should I just ignore those strange variants?
Thanks, Yachen
Hi,
I have run
svtype
,svtyper-sso
andsvtools genotype
on the same dataset. I found the variants with GT of ./. had discrepant values in other genotype fields.It shows that only the
svtyper
has a valid output, while it spent a dramatically long time to calculate it, says 10-20 folds than the other two.I wonder what happened here and should I just ignore those strange variants?
Thanks, Yachen