Currently annotations from .gff or .gbk files as input are not parced and summarized for CO or KEGG numbers. This could be an added feature.
Ether the user would (1) want to re-annotate using protein BLAST against the KEGG and COG or (2) use the existing annotations contained within the .gff or .gbk files, or (3) both. So we have to make sure the differences between these two outputs is clear.
Currently annotations from .gff or .gbk files as input are not parced and summarized for CO or KEGG numbers. This could be an added feature.
Ether the user would (1) want to re-annotate using protein BLAST against the KEGG and COG or (2) use the existing annotations contained within the .gff or .gbk files, or (3) both. So we have to make sure the differences between these two outputs is clear.