Closed raykzhao closed 3 years ago
Hi @raykzhao
It's a good idea. I am going to try to combine both in one patch with selectable options in kconfig.
Thank you
Hi @raykzhao
I have implemented some features that are dependent on interactive score scheme. I don't think I am able to make such features with HRRN for Cachy. As far I know last time you were satisfied with CacULE. Please let me know if Cachy is not needed anymore.
Thank you
Hi @hamadmarri,
Yes, currently CacULE + rdb works fine for me and you may close this issue.
Hi @hamadmarri
Since CacULE scheduler might work better on some machine/load, and Cachy might work better for the others, it probably makes sense to have a single patch and use kconfig menu to select between Cachy/CacULE, similar to how PDS/BMQ schedulers did. The source codes between Cachy/CacULE are also quite similar in my opinion, as the most noticeable difference is the scheduling policy.