Open louiseschreyers opened 1 year ago
Hi Louise,
There are alot of converging topics. I will get them grouped according to topic first. These are notes that are being used to build a piece of software that considers the environmental characteristics and the existing survey data to respond to the question:
For the moment, unless the intention is to develop a particular figure or defintion for the manuscript it is not a priority. But that will change in the next couple of days. The use case of the geo data is to label arrays that store magnitude and location data for a variety of environmental data. I will group these and assign a priority. Some can be resolved here, if not it is best to open an issue and solve it.
For questions 2, 3, 4 ,5 7: 2: that is the constant that is being used to make the calculation. it can not be omitted. 3: why? does that mean everything should be reported that way? I have not been made aware of that. 4: yes: the answer is given in the document already important changes <= but not clearly maybe. 5: yes: it is given already link
Rivers have much lower survey values and a lower variety of items (in our survey results). Therefore, when the rivers are removed so are alot of zeroes. Ther are 211 possible selections in a survey. If only one object type is found at a survey, that means there are 210 object types that were not identified. This goes to values such as the average or median or the fail rate. The sampling conditions are completely different than lakes. Swiss rivers move pretty fast and consistently.
I interpret that as vineyards, woods, wetland, orchards and undefined land use are located closer to river intersections than, buildings, city centers and schools.
UPDATE
The buffer for river intersections has been changed to 1500 m for all calculations
Very interesting new page! So this was done for all locations except river locations, right? A few remarks here: