Closed danvk closed 9 years ago
Should we just deprecate the links to IGV now that we have control over pileup visualizations?
They're still useful—there's a lot IGV can do that pileup can't, and that's likely to be true for a long time to come. Unless we do a 10-person sprint on it :)
Fair enough. I filed https://github.com/hammerlab/cycledash/issues/619 so we can document missing IGV features when we encounter them.
The two IGV links ("load" and "jump") turn out to be unnecessary. If the tracks are already loaded in IGV, reloading them is really fast.
cc @jaclynperrone