Closed dubek closed 8 years ago
Good catch. This is definitely a bug; a bug in specification.
I would prefer just to bump the minor version number after applying a fix. @krainboltgreene?
:+1:
On Fri, Dec 4, 2015 at 8:08 PM, Alex Dowad notifications@github.com wrote:
Good catch. This is definitely a bug; a bug in specification.
I would prefer just to bump the minor version number after applying a fix. @krainboltgreene https://github.com/krainboltgreene?
— Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub https://github.com/hamstergem/hamster/issues/215#issuecomment-162137494.
Kurtis Rainbolt-Greene, Hacker Software Developer 1631 8th St. New Orleans, LA 70115
Fixed in ae7e0b24c5dea0b0bfecb2d867f65b3e4bef7d36 with better specs.
Pure Ruby:
Hamster:
This is also explicitly stated in the
Hamster::Hash#values_at
rdoc:Need to consider where to fix this, this is a bug (in terms of parity with Ruby) but this fix is a change in Hamster behaviour which requires a major ver? IDK.