Closed malin-as closed 6 years ago
@malin-as This looks as a great addition. Please give it a try.
@malin-as maybe we don't need to amend namespace, what I think is we can add a new word for that porpuse and the word comes to my mind is scope
, what do you think?
IMO namespace is designed to other purpose so I prefer to add a new word like scope
or other name.
@AlfonsoUceda I don't see clearly what the difference would be between them, from the point of view of a Hanami user. The way I see it, namespace
would become just a special case of scope
, when there's no variable involved.
Either way, I'm having trouble with the internal plumbing, trying to figure out how hanami-router and http_router interact exactly, and what http_router is compiling for each route, and how to debug that. I'm afraid that's too complicated for me.
@AlfonsoUceda Can you please expand what you mean and what are the differences between namespace and scope? Thanks!
Just if it makes easier the implementation, namespace will create a namespace in ruby and scope just to work with variables.
@AlfonsoUceda but having #namespace
to dynamically create a Ruby namespace is a breaking change. Am I missing something?
Closing as stale conversation. Is someone wants to take care of this feature, please reopen this issue.
Hi,
In order to have some internationalisation support on a project, I decided to give a try to URLs of the form
https://server/en/home
whereen
is the chosen locale for the interface. I played a bit withnamespace
:This actually works, but I'm afraid it was not designed for that purpose (and might stop working in a future version), since it's impossible to set a filter on it, and since it breaks the path name generation of
resources
.What are your thoughts on such a feature? I could give a try at a PR.