search

handsitizer / reaver-wps

Automatically exported from code.google.com/p/reaver-wps
0 stars 0 forks source link

complement tip: "On the fly mac changer" or other solution to dodge lockdowns #34

Closed GoogleCodeExporter closed 8 years ago

GoogleCodeExporter commented 8 years ago 
This tool would be even more awesome if it could dodge lockdowns !

What about changing mac adress by each try to maybe dodge the security used by 
most newer routers ?

Regards from NeZZeR.

 Keep up the good work and make it seen at the backtrack forums !

Original issue reported on code.google.com by NeZZeR.G...@gmail.com on 31 Dec 2011 at 3:30

GoogleCodeExporter commented 8 years ago 
From the APs that I've tested none of them lock on a specific MAC address, just 
on a failed number of attempts (although it's possible some might). 

The problem with MAC spoofing is that Reaver uses libpcap for injection and in 
my experience it doesn't like it when you spoof the MAC (though this may be 
driver-specific). Will look into it some more when I get a chance.

Original comment by cheff...@tacnetsol.com on 31 Dec 2011 at 4:51

GoogleCodeExporter commented 8 years ago 
what if, you didn't spoof the mac.
but used multiple wireless cards?
(i had started on a comparator setup for pin pointing an AP)
(i would test this out now but i am still waiting on some hardware)
what if the option was given in the software to use 4 wireless cards?
(this would only work on a laptop with usb) 
but breaking the duty in to pieces may shorten the time needed to test pins
by a factor of X. (2 cards = 1/2 the time, 4 cards = 1/4 ect..)

Original comment by george.w...@gmail.com on 31 Dec 2011 at 12:29

GoogleCodeExporter commented 8 years ago 
More clients trying probably would mean a lot of work for the AP processor, and 
probably a lock down or a restart. It was discussed on the advissory pdf

Original comment by gorilla....@gmail.com on 31 Dec 2011 at 12:38

GoogleCodeExporter commented 8 years ago 
I have tried multiple cards and attack systems. As maguila said, the issue is 
that the bottleneck is in the AP since it is a small embedded device with 
limited resources. Some APs can't handle multiple registrars at all and having 
more than one causes neither instance of reaver to be able to test any pins.

However, simply having two MACs and rotating in round-robin fashion may help 
with the lock outs on some APs. As I said it hasn't seemed to help on any of 
the ones I've tested, but this is something I'd like to look into.

Original comment by cheff...@tacnetsol.com on 31 Dec 2011 at 1:22

GoogleCodeExporter commented 8 years ago 
I agree with cheff. I too noticed with the APs I tested that changing the mac 
address wouldn't help once you get the message: "WARNING: Detected AP rate 
limiting, waiting 315 seconds before re-trying"

Original comment by jeanbar...@gmail.com on 31 Dec 2011 at 2:48

GoogleCodeExporter commented 8 years ago

Original comment by cheff...@tacnetsol.com on 2 Jan 2012 at 3:33

GoogleCodeExporter commented 8 years ago

Original comment by cheff...@tacnetsol.com on 2 Jan 2012 at 6:19

GoogleCodeExporter commented 8 years ago 
I'm currently experimenting with the -d option to circumvent those 
bottlenecks.Maybe if we set it long enough, the AP will think that a new device 
is trying to make contact. It slows down the process, but hopefully it will 
outsmart the lockdown

Original comment by jage...@gmail.com on 3 Jan 2012 at 11:28

GoogleCodeExporter commented 8 years ago 
AP-specific options can now be added to the Reaver database (need latest SVN 
code) and applied automatically, so if you find options that work well for a 
given AP, you can add them there. Unfortunately there doesn't appear to be much 
we can do at the moment to circumvent lockdowns.

Original comment by cheff...@tacnetsol.com on 3 Jan 2012 at 2:09

GoogleCodeExporter commented 8 years ago 
Not sure if anybody still wants this feature, but I decided to add it.

Original comment by ATARIVampire on 10 May 2013 at 12:40