improper call record

[GoogleCodeExporter]

NOTE: This form is only for reporting bugs. For problems, questions, or
comments, please visit:  http://groups.google.com/group/sipdroid-users

*************************************************
* Read the FAQ                                  *
*    Check if the bug has already been reported *
*        No doubles please                      *
*************************************************

Did you carefully read above and decide this means of communication is the
right for your notice? Don't just list an incompatible SIP server or
device, please. Try to look behind the scenes if you like to
contribute here. Thanks!

--
What steps will reproduce the problem?
1.
2.
3.

What is the expected output? What do you see instead?
call record without prefix

What version of the product are you using? On what operating system?
sipdroid 1.1.7 andorid 1.5 HTC G1

Which SIP server are you using? What happens with PBXes?
vbuzzer

Please provide any additional information below
When add rule in "search and replace" like "(.*),01186\1", and dial and 
number. The 01186xxx is recorded in the call record. Next time when redial 
the record, there will be dobule prefix, like 0118601186xxx. I think it is 
awful.

Can you make sipdorid cowork fine with android call record?

Another problem is how to use multiple rules in "search and replace"?

Original issue reported on code.google.com by holog...@gmail.com on 10 Nov 2009 at 1:48

[GoogleCodeExporter]

It should be very usefull that the number saved in call history is the number 
without
modification (prefixe or search and replace). So, it should match with the 
number of
my contact.

Original comment by tony.bau...@gmail.com on 2 Feb 2010 at 10:46

[GoogleCodeExporter]

yes. The call history is very important for good using experience. It affact 
the redial function

Original comment by holog...@gmail.com on 17 Feb 2010 at 1:53

[GoogleCodeExporter]

[deleted comment]

[GoogleCodeExporter]

does search phrase support "|" regular to function like mulitmatch?

Original comment by holog...@gmail.com on 11 Apr 2010 at 4:22