Open hansen7 opened 4 years ago
Unsupervised/Representation Learning on Point Cloud
No need to compare, they does not outperform ''3D jigsaw'' with the same configs
Not Comparable, focus on different tasks (shape correspondence).
Not Comparable, they develop a new baseline model and mainly compare pre-trained and random initialisation on their own baselines, and mostly focus on the semantic segmentation, has been used in the follow-up
: Interesting paper, worth a cite, results are not directly comparable to ours
from peers
we also conduct and outperform this in fsl setting.
also use reconstruction as the training task
Our NRS Paper: https://arxiv.org/abs/1911.07845
Thanks for your summery!
For self-supervised session, another two follow-ups for PointContrast:
Thanks @ShengyuH , I've read both but am a bit lazy to update。。。
It turns out there are not much breakthroughs in the contrastive learning for point cloud models, to be honest (i.e., see Matthias and Alexei's discussion on the completion and contrastive pre-training for 3D, ~1:07:00 in this video). But the augmentation designs in the DepthContrast paper is a bit novel, w.r.t this discussion on what should not be contrastive in images contrastive learning
Feel free if you have anything in mind and happy to collaborate :)
Point Cloud Completion