After reading your paper, I am not very clear how the speed up came from.
From my understanding, traditional cost volume approach build cost volume of size BXCXDXHXW,
but in your approach you compute the dot product between two features, which results in BXDXHXW .
Cost aggregation on a 4D cost volume is significant faster than a 5D counterpart, you can check the Complexity Analysis part in Section 4.4 of our paper.
Hi!
After reading your paper, I am not very clear how the speed up came from.
From my understanding, traditional cost volume approach build cost volume of size BXCXDXHXW, but in your approach you compute the dot product between two features, which results in BXDXHXW .
Is this where the speed up came from?
Thank you for your reply!