Closed italobusi closed 1 year ago
Is there a convention for how the ends are referenced? This has a mix of 'one' and 'other' with '-1' and '-2' No change made. I think it's reasonable to have -1 and -2 in the model, but 'one' and 'other' in description. Tweak my English... Originally posted by @haomianzheng in https://github.com/haomianzheng/IETF-ACTN-YANG-Model/issues/125#issuecomment-1356081448
Is there a convention for how the ends are referenced? This has a mix of 'one' and 'other' with '-1' and '-2'
No change made. I think it's reasonable to have -1 and -2 in the model, but 'one' and 'other' in description. Tweak my English...
Originally posted by @haomianzheng in https://github.com/haomianzheng/IETF-ACTN-YANG-Model/issues/125#issuecomment-1356081448
It may be better (and future proof) to define a list of endpoints with two and only two elements:
+--rw endpoint [id] +--rw id string +--rw uni -> /l1-connectivity/access/unis/uni/id
Need to update also the JSON examples
It may be better (and future proof) to define a list of endpoints with two and only two elements: