Éric Vyncke's Discuss on draft-ietf-ccamp-layer1-types-16

italobusi commented 9 months ago

DISCUSS:

Other thanks to Dirk Von Hugo, the Internet directorate reviewer (at my request), please consider this int-dir review: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/review-ietf-ccamp-layer1-types-16-intdir-telechat-von-hugo-2023-12-09/ (even if only nits, it would be nice to see a reply from the authors)

DISCUSS (blocking)

As noted in https://www.ietf.org/blog/handling-iesg-ballot-positions/, a DISCUSS ballot is a request to have a discussion on the following topics:

Layer 1 vs. OTN

The I-D title and the abstract first sentence (as well as CCAMP charter) are misleading: it is not about generic layer-1 but only about a very specific one: OTN. I.e., the content does not match the wrapping, please update the title and the abstract.

Obviously, this is not a DISCUSS level point but I want to get a discussion with the authors and the responsible AD(s) before clearing my ballot to either NoObj (if the scope is changed) or to abstain (if text/title is unchanged).

COMMENT:

COMMENTS (non-blocking)

Section 7

Should the writable data nodes be listed with the associated security vulnerabilities ? Per https://wiki.ietf.org/group/ops/yang-security-guidelines