Closed haomianzheng closed 3 years ago
There are two options to setup an EPL service between two 1GE access links:
GMP is always used in case 1 and GFP-F is always in case 2
The only open issue would be about client-signals which can use either AMP or BMP (e.g., STM-16)
According to the discussion so far, it is proposed to use option A in the layer1-types. Meanwhile another parameters indicating the multiplexing would be added on the client-signal model. The new parameter is going to be re-confirmed when updating the client-signal YANG.
To be discussed:
So we specify the GFP-F and the GMP multiplexing in the same identity or via different identities in otn-types.yang?
Option A: identity ETH-1Gb { base client-signal; description "Client signal type of 1GbE"; }
Option B: identity ETH-1Gb-GFPF { base client-signal; description "Client signal type of 1GbE with GFP-F"; }
identity ETH-1Gb-GMP { base client-signal; description "Client signal type of 1GbE with GMP"; }