Open ZahraFan opened 1 month ago
Thank you for your interest in our work and for your careful observation.
You're correct. This discrepancy is due to our different testing methodology. We independently preprocessed all test images by cropping them to ensure that the corresponding high-resolution (HR) size was 512x512 pixels before conducting our tests. This cropping step likely differs from the original approach used in the StableSR paper. As a result, our reported metrics don't match those in the original paper.
Hi! The work is inspiring!
However, I have some doubts while reading the paper. The metric performance values for several baseline methods in Table 1 do not seem to match what I have seen in related papers. For example, StableSR tested on RealSR gives PSNR\SSIM\LPIPS values of 24.65\0.7080\0.3002, which appear worse than the data shown in your paper. If I have missed some details, please point them out.
Could you provide some information about the testing process?