hapijs / bell

Third-party login plugin for hapi
Other
624 stars 210 forks source link

Using for 3rd party tenants #464

Open tyrw opened 4 years ago

tyrw commented 4 years ago

Support plan

Context

How can we help?

We would like to allow our users to build out social logins custom to their project. This means that, within each project and for each social provider, there would be a different clientId and clientSecret.

Example: Project A, Twitter login: clientId: aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa clientSecret: aaaaaaaaAAAAAAAAaaaaaaaAAAAAAA

Project B, Twitter login: clientId: bbbbbbbbbbbbbbbb clientSecret: bbbbbbbBBBBBBBBBbbbbbbbBBBBBBB

However the documented method is to configure for a single application for each provider and then register a route handler:

Registration

async function registerSocial() {
  await server.register(Bell)

  server.auth.strategy('twitter', 'bell', {
    provider: 'twitter',
    password: 'cookie_encryption_password_secure',
    clientId: 'aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa',
    clientSecret: 'aaaaaaaaAAAAAAAAaaaaaaaAAAAAAA',
  })
}

Route handler

{
  method: ['GET', 'POST'],
  path: '/auth/twitter/login',
  handler: async (request, h) => {
    try {
      if (!request.auth.isAuthenticated) {
        return `Authentication failed due to: ${request.auth.error.message}`
      }

      // Perform any account lookup or registration, setup local session,
      // and redirect to the application. The third-party credentials are
      // stored in request.auth.credentials. Any query parameters from
      // the initial request are passed back via request.auth.credentials.query.

      return h.redirect('/')
    } catch (err) {
      return routeUtils.handleErr(err, h)
    }
  },
  config: {
    auth: {
      mode: 'try',
      strategy: 'twitter',
    },
  },
},

Is it possible to perform the Registration step in some other way? Potential solutions might include:

If this is supported, we would love a hint at the documentation. If it is not supported, we would love a nudge in the right direction for how we might implement this ourselves.

Thank you!

tyrw commented 4 years ago

We have a working proof of concept for this, with an API like:

server.auth.strategy('twitter', 'bell', {
    provider: 'twitter',
    password: 'cookie_encryption_password_secure',
    clientFunction: async function (request, settings) {
        // Set clientId & clientSecret based on request info, e.g.
        // settings.clientId = 'aaaaaaaaaaaa'
        // settings.clientSecret = 'aaaaaaaAAAAAAAAaaaaaaaa'
    }
})

It does require some changes to how & where clientId and clientSecret are passed around.

Technically it's structured so that any of the settings could be looked up & assigned based on information in the request (not just clientId and clientSecret).

If we write up tests and documentation covering this use case, will you accept a PR for it, or do you consider this outside the scope of the normal use?

tyrw commented 4 years ago

Is anyone monitoring the issues here?

cjihrig commented 4 years ago

Is anyone monitoring the issues here?

Yes. A new group of maintainers has taken over hapi recently, and we're still getting everything up and running. Sorry for any delay.