Closed lostthetrail closed 7 years ago
Not at this time. There IS a way you could hack it but it's not documented and would require you doing some things you "aren't supposed to do".
That sounds like it may be a better option than clone and own of Good... Your thoughts?
It's unlikely that we'll add support for custom things outside the hapi ecosystem. If you're http client has a handle to a hapi server object, you could just send logs though that, then it would get picked up by good.
The magic that lets wreck logging work is https://github.com/hapijs/good/blob/master/lib/monitor.js#L141-L144. I guess if we really really wanted to add outside things, we would do it similar to that but again, I don't know if there's much value in that change. If we supported outside things, they would all have to agree to the same interface to work with good and I really doubt we'll be able to make that happen. Like your http how were you planning sending out logging information?
The plan was to have the http client emit events on a symbol. The events were to contain timing information for both aggregated metrics and specific logging for debugging.
For example: using that timing information to know you have a DNS problem, but also to correlate a single users bad experience with a slow response in creating a socket.
I could just log it out directly or attach the timings to the response object.
For now, I have just been using request.log
to get the support I wanted.
This thread has been automatically locked due to inactivity. Please open a new issue for related bugs or questions following the new issue template instructions.
Example: I have an http client that emits events much like wreck, but includes a bunch of additional features.
Is there a way to support custom events, much like wreck is currently supported, in the library?