Should we remove the multiple factory methods on the iterator matches?

hardayal / hamcrest

Automatically exported from code.google.com/p/hamcrest

0 stars 0 forks source link

Should we remove the multiple factory methods on the iterator matches? #67

Closed GoogleCodeExporter closed 8 years ago

GoogleCodeExporter commented 8 years ago

Personally, I'm finding the proliferation of overloaded factory methods in the 
iterator matchers 
annoying. They clog up the code and the prompts in the IDE. The alternative is 
that people have to 
turn off checking with an Annotation.

What do people think? Comments please as I'd like to get out another drop.

Original issue reported on code.google.com by smgfree...@gmail.com on 27 Feb 2009 at 11:05

GoogleCodeExporter commented 8 years ago

Have a look at issue 62.  That might provide a solution.

Original comment by nat.pr...@gmail.com on 27 Feb 2009 at 11:45

GoogleCodeExporter commented 8 years ago

Unless somebody out there objects by the end of the week they're coming out.

Original comment by smgfree...@gmail.com on 2 Mar 2009 at 8:52

GoogleCodeExporter commented 8 years ago

Removed extra methods

Original comment by smgfree...@gmail.com on 21 Mar 2009 at 11:39

Changed state: Fixed
Added labels: 1.2RC5, Priority-High

GoogleCodeExporter commented 8 years ago

Original comment by smgfree...@gmail.com on 21 Mar 2009 at 11:50

Added labels: 1.2RC4
Removed labels: 1.2RC5

GoogleCodeExporter commented 8 years ago

Original comment by smgfree...@gmail.com on 21 May 2009 at 10:44

Added labels: 1.2

GoogleCodeExporter commented 8 years ago

Original comment by smgfree...@gmail.com on 21 May 2009 at 10:45

Removed labels: 1.2RC4