Closed garretrieger closed 2 years ago
I guess it's a bit too late, but I think it might have been nicer or more pythonic to add an optional table_tag=""
keyword argument to the existing repack
method, instead of defining/exporting an additional repack_with_tag
method in the public uharfbuzz API. I guess you did that to more closely match Harfbuzz's own C API.
The test failure seems to be caused by changes in the message callbacks, please update the test expectations.