psarka
commented
3 years ago Yes, it is possible, and monotinic should not be a dependency (it is only used for testing)
Scratch that, it is used in the code as well. However, monotonic time is in stdlib for 3.5+, so I guess we will not fix this, and just move to stdlib function, as the older python versions are no longer officially supported.
Do you guys have any guess why I'm getting this crash? Or if not, is there any way to fork this library in a way that does not depend upon monotonic?
Thanks for any thoughts you have ... I'm in quite a bind:
File "/Users/dgaedcke/dev/gaeStdEndptTestcase/lib/apitools/base/py/credentials_lib.py", line 44, in
import fasteners
File "/Users/dgaedcke/dev/gaeStdEndptTestcase/lib/fasteners/init.py", line 23, in
from fasteners.lock import locked # noqa
File "/Users/dgaedcke/dev/gaeStdEndptTestcase/lib/fasteners/lock.py", line 24, in
from fasteners import _utils
File "/Users/dgaedcke/dev/gaeStdEndptTestcase/lib/fasteners/_utils.py", line 39, in
from monotonic import monotonic as now # noqa
File "/Users/dgaedcke/dev/gaeStdEndptTestcase/lib/monotonic.py", line 50, in
import ctypes
File "/Library/Frameworks/Python.framework/Versions/2.7/lib/python2.7/ctypes/init.py", line 29, in
if int(_os.uname()[2].split('.')[0]) < 8:
ValueError: invalid literal for int() with base 10: ''