Open chinmay5 opened 11 months ago
Hi Chinmay,
If you are trying to generate adjacency matrices, node features, and 3D coordinates all at once, I think the second method would be optimal (in the sense that each SDE can be optimally designed with respect to the objects to be generated). The extension of GDSS by adding the third component would be fairly trivial in the context of modeling the systems of SDEs.
Note that your first method may work fairly well when assuming that the node features and the 3D coordinates share similar properties (that can be modeled by the same diffusion process).
Best, Jaehyeong
Thank you for the wonderful and inspiring work. I have a question regarding generating graphs with 3D node coordinate locations. If I want to generate graphs that should also learn orientation information (in 3D space) of the underlying distribution (by means of generating raw coordinates for the nodes along with other node features), should I
Your insights would be extremely helpful.
Thanks, Chinmay