Closed reteP-riS closed 3 years ago
I never used or have seen these three values. The translations are simply missing.
GEDCOM 5.5.1 says:
CHILD_TO_FAMILY_LINK:=
n FAMC @<XREF:FAM>@
+1 PEDI <PEDIGREE_LINKAGE_TYPE>
+1 STAT <CHILD_LINKAGE_STATUS>
So your code
1 FAMC @F1@
2 PEDI challenged
is not compliant. It should look like
1 FAMC @F1@
2 PEDI birth
2 STAT challenged
Labels for "2 STAT challenged", "2 STAT disproven" and "2 STAT proven" will be part of the next release.
Thank you, Hermann! My bad.
I have several child relationships that are being challenged. There are documented GEDCOM 5.5.1 compliant as
1 FAMC @F1@ 2 PEDI challenged
The respective label is in green letters and says "challenged" in all languages I tested. Are the translations simply missing or did you intentionally leave them out? I'd prefer the translation. As there are only three different options, i. e. PEDI [challenged | disproven | proven] that should be possible.