Closed aurelian closed 7 years ago
This one is close, but no cigar.
@aurelian "This is k-mart quality"
What does that mean?
Regarding the owl and cat feet, there are definitely a lot of false positives. Hopefully this will turn into the "kittydar said something else was a cat" issue.
In any case, any one is welcome to fork and make it better so there are less false positives in general.
@harthur it was a joke, obviously the context was missing - one sent me a link to your demo, uploaded said owl. You can imagine the rest. Sorry about that. Promise, I won't open github issues after having 1 beer :|
How do I train the classifier or where should I look to have less false positives?
I think i see what's happened here, that wavy branch in the capture area could be mistaken for ears. i think it's pretty funny.
I'm wondering how kittydar can find those tilted heads, (see arielp's image) Should we try splitting up the image into various rotated rectangle areas? or train the classifier to recognise more tilted heads?
How do I train the classifier or where should I look to have less false positives?
There are three ways to make this better:
I just increased the classification threshold though, so that will get rid of a bunch of false positives and the expense of just a couple more false negatives probably. I think your owl image now detects 0 cats overall.
I'm wondering how kittydar can find those tilted heads, (see arielp's image) Should we try splitting up the image into various rotated rectangle areas? or train the classifier to recognise more tilted heads?
Yeah, it's not testing any different orientations right now. The best way is the first way you mention, testing at different angles instead of training at different angles.
train with random rotations and aspect ratios applied artificially. add a few more nn layers.
This is k-mart quality
This is not a cat
Original image: http://cl.ly/HP4G
Nevertheless, nice work