harvester / harvester

Open source hyperconverged infrastructure (HCI) software
https://harvesterhci.io/
Apache License 2.0
3.64k stars 308 forks source link

[ENHANCEMENT] Bump Harvester OS to SLE-Micro 5.5 #6027

Open Vicente-Cheng opened 1 week ago

Vicente-Cheng commented 1 week ago

Is your enhancement related to a problem? Please describe. We should use the newer OS for v1.4.0

Describe the solution you'd like Bump OS with SLE-Micro 5.5

Describe alternatives you've considered None

Additional context None

innobead commented 1 week ago

Have we considered bumping to SLE-Micro 5.6?

Vicente-Cheng commented 1 week ago

Have we considered bumping to SLE-Micro 5.6?

The next release of SLE-Micro 5.5 is SLE-Micro 6.0 (Ref: https://www.suse.com/lifecycle/#suse-linux-enterprise-micro)

IIUC, there are some major changes (like moving to btrfs instead image-based immutable OS) on SLE-Micro 6.0. So, I thought we should use SLE-Micro 5.5 instead SLE-MIcro 6.0. (6.0 will bring too many potential risks) Also, the EoL of SLE-Micro 5.5 is' 31 Oct 2027`. It's long enough for us to move on to the next.

harvesterhci-io-github-bot commented 4 days ago

Pre Ready-For-Testing Checklist

~* [ ] If labeled: require/HEP Has the Harvester Enhancement Proposal PR submitted? The HEP PR is at:~

Test Plan: This is a base OS change, we can check the daily e2e test result to see any weird failure after that. Also, we can check the base OS version like below (with the installation from master-head ISO)

harvester-node-0:~ # cat /etc/os-release
NAME="SLE Micro"
VERSION="5.5"
VERSION_ID="5.5"
...

Make sure the NAME and VERSION look like the above.

~* [ ] Is there a workaround for the issue? If so, where is it documented? The workaround is at:~

~* [ ] If labeled: area/ui Has the UI issue filed or ready to be merged? The UI issue/PR is at:~

~* [ ] If labeled: require/doc, require/knowledge-base Has the necessary document PR submitted or merged? The documentation/KB PR is at:~

~* [ ] If NOT labeled: not-require/test-plan Has the e2e test plan been merged? Have QAs agreed on the automation test case? If only test case skeleton w/o implementation, have you created an implementation issue?

~* [ ] If the fix introduces the code for backward compatibility Has a separate issue been filed with the label release/obsolete-compatibility? The compatibility issue is filed at:~

harvesterhci-io-github-bot commented 4 days ago

Automation e2e test issue: harvester/tests#1336