Closed Korijn closed 7 years ago
Is that a question? This package only works with Python 3.4 or greater.
On Aug 8, 2017 13:41, "Korijn van Golen" notifications@github.com wrote:
— You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/harvimt/quamash/issues/72, or mute the thread https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AAHRQtnNvl188F2ssasR9Ns0TEUxo6KRks5sWMfvgaJpZM4OxQ_1 .
The README doesn't state that 3.6 is supported by this library. So I decided to ask if it is the case.
If it is merely outdated information I can open a PR to correct it for you?
ugh. this is one of those times where having a working test suite would be good, because then we could re-run the test suite on 3.6 and then we'd know it works.
It should work just fine on 3.6 though.
Fixing Travis seems simple enough; just two flake8 errors.
./quamash/_unix.py:220:1: E305 expected 2 blank lines after class or function definition, found 1
./quamash/__init__.py:172:1: E305 expected 2 blank lines after class or function definition, found 1
From https://travis-ci.org/harvimt/quamash/jobs/188431070
Is there a big issue holding you back that I'm overlooking? If it's just some linting I'll fix it for you.
test_regression_bug13
fails on AppVeyor I see: https://ci.appveyor.com/project/harvimt/quamash
This also seems fixable to me.
Last I checked Travis was failing to install PyQt, but I guess hadn't looked in a while?
The Appveyor tests are another thing, getting all the tests to pass on windows would be good (but not necessary to declare compat with python 3.6)
On Tue, Aug 8, 2017 at 10:40 PM, Korijn van Golen notifications@github.com wrote:
Lots of errors on AppVeyor I see: https://ci.appveyor.com/ project/harvimt/quamash
Is that the big issue?
— You are receiving this because you commented. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/harvimt/quamash/issues/72#issuecomment-321157976, or mute the thread https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AAHRQpaXQXEYLz8-XlHpViUVwbfzjC7Yks5sWUY7gaJpZM4OxQ_1 .
I opened PR #74 to get CI to pass first.
Once that is merged I will open another PR to enable Python 3.6.
Any efforts going on to support python 3.6? Are you accepting PRs?