I'm building a version of mizani using conda for conda-forge. (To be clear, while the principal package in the linked pull is plotnine, mizani is also being built as a dependency.) When possible, we try to include a link to the license file in the meta.yaml specification for the build; doing so requires the license be indexed in an explicit MANIFEST.in file so that it gets included in the source distribution.
Currently I'm using a local copy of the license, but this pull should add a copy of the license to the next source build.
Coverage remained the same at 94.595% when pulling d2f43f5157237b49a2937ac7d9a3365b5ce4970f on pmlandwehr:patch-1 into 507c83b767b7cc415ab8b917e1b118fc48b4a1f7 on has2k1:master.
Coverage remained the same at 94.595% when pulling d2f43f5157237b49a2937ac7d9a3365b5ce4970f on pmlandwehr:patch-1 into 507c83b767b7cc415ab8b917e1b118fc48b4a1f7 on has2k1:master.
Hey-lo,
I'm building a version of
mizani
usingconda
for conda-forge. (To be clear, while the principal package in the linked pull isplotnine
,mizani
is also being built as a dependency.) When possible, we try to include a link to the license file in themeta.yaml
specification for the build; doing so requires the license be indexed in an explicitMANIFEST.in
file so that it gets included in the source distribution.Currently I'm using a local copy of the license, but this pull should add a copy of the license to the next source build.