Closed victor-yanev closed 3 weeks ago
20 files 256 suites 38m 2s :stopwatch: 599 tests 574 :heavy_check_mark: 4 :zzz: 21 :x: 728 runs 701 :heavy_check_mark: 4 :zzz: 23 :x:
Results for commit 5002fe43.
:recycle: This comment has been updated with latest results.
3 files 398 suites 18s :stopwatch: 1 418 tests 1 417 :heavy_check_mark: 1 :zzz: 0 :x: 1 427 runs 1 426 :heavy_check_mark: 1 :zzz: 0 :x:
Results for commit 5002fe43.
19 files - 1 251 suites - 32 32m 39s :stopwatch: - 1m 56s 607 tests + 2 598 :white_check_mark: + 7 4 :zzz: ±0 5 :x: - 5 696 runs - 98 687 :white_check_mark: - 93 4 :zzz: ±0 5 :x: - 5
For more details on these failures, see this check.
Results for commit dc49c9df. ± Comparison against base commit 9afe7c21.
:recycle: This comment has been updated with latest results.
Issues
0 New issues
2 Accepted issues
Measures
0 Security Hotspots
No data about Coverage
0.0% Duplication on New Code
A potential memory leak has been detected in the test titled validates enforcement of request id
. This may impact the application's performance and stability.
📊 Memory Leak Detection Report 📊
GC Type: MarkSweepCompact Cost: 28,715.7 ms
Heap Statistics (before vs after executing the test):
Heap Space Statistics (before vs after executing the test):
Old Space:
Large Object Space:
Please investigate the memory allocations in this test, focusing on objects that are not being properly deallocated.
A potential memory leak has been detected in the test titled should execute "eth_accounts"
. This may impact the application's performance and stability.
📊 Memory Leak Detection Report 📊
GC Type: Scavenge Cost: 784.991 ms
Heap Statistics (before vs after executing the test):
Heap Space Statistics (before vs after executing the test):
Please investigate the memory allocations in this test, focusing on objects that are not being properly deallocated.
A potential memory leak has been detected in the test titled should execute "eth_getTransactionByHash with missing transaction"
. This may impact the application's performance and stability.
📊 Memory Leak Detection Report 📊
GC Type: Scavenge Cost: 6,341.77 ms
Heap Statistics (before vs after executing the test):
Heap Space Statistics (before vs after executing the test):
GC Type: Scavenge Cost: 4,331.32 ms
Heap Statistics (before vs after executing the test):
Heap Space Statistics (before vs after executing the test):
New Space:
Old Space:
GC Type: MarkSweepCompact Cost: 35,614.5 ms
Heap Statistics (before vs after executing the test):
Heap Space Statistics (before vs after executing the test):
Please investigate the memory allocations in this test, focusing on objects that are not being properly deallocated.
A potential memory leak has been detected in the test titled should execute "net_peerCount"
. This may impact the application's performance and stability.
📊 Memory Leak Detection Report 📊
GC Type: MarkSweepCompact Cost: 22,483.3 ms
Heap Statistics (before vs after executing the test):
Heap Space Statistics (before vs after executing the test):
Please investigate the memory allocations in this test, focusing on objects that are not being properly deallocated.
A potential memory leak has been detected in the test titled should execute "eth_sendTransaction"
. This may impact the application's performance and stability.
📊 Memory Leak Detection Report 📊
GC Type: MarkSweepCompact Cost: 22,622.1 ms
Heap Statistics (before vs after executing the test):
Heap Space Statistics (before vs after executing the test):
Please investigate the memory allocations in this test, focusing on objects that are not being properly deallocated.
A potential memory leak has been detected in the test titled should not execute batch request when disabled
. This may impact the application's performance and stability.
📊 Memory Leak Detection Report 📊
GC Type: MarkSweepCompact Cost: 25,023.9 ms
Heap Statistics (before vs after executing the test):
Heap Space Statistics (before vs after executing the test):
Please investigate the memory allocations in this test, focusing on objects that are not being properly deallocated.
A potential memory leak has been detected in the test titled validates parameter 1 is valid block tag
. This may impact the application's performance and stability.
📊 Memory Leak Detection Report 📊
GC Type: MarkSweepCompact Cost: 24,004.4 ms
Heap Statistics (before vs after executing the test):
Heap Space Statistics (before vs after executing the test):
Please investigate the memory allocations in this test, focusing on objects that are not being properly deallocated.
A potential memory leak has been detected in the test titled validates parameter 1 exists
. This may impact the application's performance and stability.
📊 Memory Leak Detection Report 📊
GC Type: MarkSweepCompact Cost: 27,262.9 ms
Heap Statistics (before vs after executing the test):
Heap Space Statistics (before vs after executing the test):
Please investigate the memory allocations in this test, focusing on objects that are not being properly deallocated.
A potential memory leak has been detected in the test titled validates parameter 0 exists
. This may impact the application's performance and stability.
📊 Memory Leak Detection Report 📊
GC Type: MarkSweepCompact Cost: 25,286.9 ms
Heap Statistics (before vs after executing the test):
Heap Space Statistics (before vs after executing the test):
Please investigate the memory allocations in this test, focusing on objects that are not being properly deallocated.
A potential memory leak has been detected in the test titled validates toBlock filter
. This may impact the application's performance and stability.
📊 Memory Leak Detection Report 📊
GC Type: MarkSweepCompact Cost: 26,233.3 ms
Heap Statistics (before vs after executing the test):
Heap Space Statistics (before vs after executing the test):
Please investigate the memory allocations in this test, focusing on objects that are not being properly deallocated.
A potential memory leak has been detected in the test titled should execute metrics collection
. This may impact the application's performance and stability.
📊 Memory Leak Detection Report 📊
GC Type: Scavenge Cost: 3,357.12 ms
Heap Statistics (before vs after executing the test):
Heap Space Statistics (before vs after executing the test):
GC Type: Scavenge Cost: 2,540.88 ms
Heap Statistics (before vs after executing the test):
Heap Space Statistics (before vs after executing the test):
New Space:
Old Space:
Please investigate the memory allocations in this test, focusing on objects that are not being properly deallocated.
A potential memory leak has been detected in the test titled should execute with valid hash, valid TracerType and empty TracerConfig
. This may impact the application's performance and stability.
📊 Memory Leak Detection Report 📊
GC Type: MarkSweepCompact Cost: 48,585.7 ms
Heap Statistics (before vs after executing the test):
Heap Space Statistics (before vs after executing the test):
Please investigate the memory allocations in this test, focusing on objects that are not being properly deallocated.
A potential memory leak has been detected in the test titled should execute with empty TracerConfigWrapper.tracerConfig
. This may impact the application's performance and stability.
📊 Memory Leak Detection Report 📊
GC Type: MarkSweepCompact Cost: 25,461.2 ms
Heap Statistics (before vs after executing the test):
Heap Space Statistics (before vs after executing the test):
New Space:
Old Space:
Please investigate the memory allocations in this test, focusing on objects that are not being properly deallocated.
A potential memory leak has been detected in the test titled should fail with valid hash and invalid TracerType string
. This may impact the application's performance and stability.
📊 Memory Leak Detection Report 📊
GC Type: MarkSweepCompact Cost: 33,784.5 ms
Heap Statistics (before vs after executing the test):
Heap Space Statistics (before vs after executing the test):
Please investigate the memory allocations in this test, focusing on objects that are not being properly deallocated.
A potential memory leak has been detected in the test titled throws an error if address is NOT 0x prefixed
. This may impact the application's performance and stability.
📊 Memory Leak Detection Report 📊
GC Type: MarkSweepCompact Cost: 38,176.7 ms
Heap Statistics (before vs after executing the test):
Heap Space Statistics (before vs after executing the test):
Please investigate the memory allocations in this test, focusing on objects that are not being properly deallocated.
A potential memory leak has been detected in the test titled throws an error if the param is not an array
. This may impact the application's performance and stability.
📊 Memory Leak Detection Report 📊
GC Type: MarkSweepCompact Cost: 28,368.4 ms
Heap Statistics (before vs after executing the test):
Heap Space Statistics (before vs after executing the test):
Please investigate the memory allocations in this test, focusing on objects that are not being properly deallocated.
A potential memory leak has been detected in the test titled throws error if block number is not correct tag
. This may impact the application's performance and stability.
📊 Memory Leak Detection Report 📊
GC Type: MarkSweepCompact Cost: 37,390 ms
Heap Statistics (before vs after executing the test):
Heap Space Statistics (before vs after executing the test):
Please investigate the memory allocations in this test, focusing on objects that are not being properly deallocated.
A potential memory leak has been detected in the test titled throws an error for input: {"tracer":"opcodeLogger","tracerConfig":{"disableStack":"invalid"}}
. This may impact the application's performance and stability.
📊 Memory Leak Detection Report 📊
GC Type: MarkSweepCompact Cost: 26,701.9 ms
Heap Statistics (before vs after executing the test):
Heap Space Statistics (before vs after executing the test):
Please investigate the memory allocations in this test, focusing on objects that are not being properly deallocated.
A potential memory leak has been detected in the test titled does not throw an error for input: {"tracer":"opcodeLogger","tracerConfig":{}}
. This may impact the application's performance and stability.
📊 Memory Leak Detection Report 📊
GC Type: MarkSweepCompact Cost: 27,439 ms
Heap Statistics (before vs after executing the test):
Heap Space Statistics (before vs after executing the test):
Please investigate the memory allocations in this test, focusing on objects that are not being properly deallocated.
A potential memory leak has been detected in the test titled should return the limit duration from environment variable
. This may impact the application's performance and stability.
📊 Memory Leak Detection Report 📊
GC Type: MarkSweepCompact Cost: 37,021.4 ms
Heap Statistics (before vs after executing the test):
Heap Space Statistics (before vs after executing the test):
Please investigate the memory allocations in this test, focusing on objects that are not being properly deallocated.
Attention: Patch coverage is 95.45455%
with 2 lines
in your changes missing coverage. Please review.
Project coverage is 83.37%. Comparing base (
9afe7c2
) to head (dc49c9d
). Report is 1 commits behind head on main.
Description:
This PR introduces changes to ensure that preconfigured HBAR spending plans are protected from automatic deletion by the
LRUCache
on reaching the maximum cache size.Includes the following updates:
reservedCache: LRUCache<string, any>
instance inside theLocalLRUCache
class which is used to store a cache of reserved keys without a default TTL setCacheService
initialization to include reserved keys for protecting preconfigured spending plans.Related issue(s):
Fixes #3096
Notes for reviewer:
Checklist