Refactor the way contract action index is tracked in `OpcodeTracer`

[victor-yanev]

Description:

Problem

Currently the way that the contractActionIndexOfCurrentFrame is tracked inside OpcodeTracer is not exactly how it is done in the HederaTracer, where the list of contract actions is built and we are still using the mono code in the web3 module, so we need to refactor this to be identical to what is done in HederaTracer. We need to copy the logic from there and increment the contractActionIndexOfCurrentFrame in the places where items are pushed to the allActions list in HederaTracer.

This PR

Copies the way contract actions are added to the allActions list in HederaTracer

• Increments the index in init, tracePrecompileResult, traceAccountCreationResult, and tracePostExecution
• Adds the HederaOperationTracer interface
• Copies the needed logic from which handles the precompile calls, updates the state of the message frames, sets an exceptional halt reason and also calls the tracePrecompileResult method from the HederaOperationTracer interface.

TODO:

• Test that there are no regressions in the eth_call, eth_estimateGas and debug_traceTransaction methods
• Verify that OpcodeTracer returns the correct revert reason for reverting HTS calls by taking the right contract action with the index that is tracked:
  • try to locally deploy a test contract which does different nested contract calls, some of which are reverting HTS calls
  • hit the contract/results/{transactionIdOrHash}/opcodes endpoint to replay the transaction
  • debug the OpcodeTracer to verify that the contractActionIndexOfCurrentFrame is correct when we hit the tracePrecompileCall method for the HTS calls

Related issue(s):

Fixes #8639

Notes for reviewer:

Checklist

• [ ] Documented (Code comments, README, etc.)
• [ ] Tested (unit, integration, etc.)

[codecov[bot]]

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests :white_check_mark:

Project coverage is 91.90%. Comparing base (1733949) to head (2714de0).

Additional details and impacted files

```diff @@ Coverage Diff @@ ## main #8650 +/- ## ============================================ - Coverage 92.11% 91.90% -0.22% + Complexity 7541 3778 -3763 ============================================ Files 920 606 -314 Lines 30066 19797 -10269 Branches 3659 2489 -1170 ============================================ - Hits 27696 18194 -9502 + Misses 1547 1197 -350 + Partials 823 406 -417 ```

:umbrella: View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
:loudspeaker: Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

[sonarcloud[bot]]

Quality Gate failed

Failed conditions
C Reliability Rating on New Code (required ≥ A)

See analysis details on SonarCloud

Catch issues before they fail your Quality Gate with our IDE extension SonarLint