Tech Debt: WAFv2 Regex Pattern Set AccTest Consistently failing due to resource limit - Githubissues

hashicorp / terraform-provider-aws

The AWS Provider enables Terraform to manage AWS resources.

https://registry.terraform.io/providers/hashicorp/aws

Mozilla Public License 2.0

9.81k stars 9.16k forks source link

Tech Debt: WAFv2 Regex Pattern Set AccTest Consistently failing due to resource limit #15358

Closed anGie44 closed 3 years ago

anGie44 commented 4 years ago

Community Note

Please vote on this issue by adding a 👍 reaction to the original issue to help the community and maintainers prioritize this request
Please do not leave "+1" or other comments that do not add relevant new information or questions, they generate extra noise for issue followers and do not help prioritize the request
If you are interested in working on this issue or have submitted a pull request, please leave a comment

Affected Resource Test(s)

aws_wafv2_regex_pattern_set

Test Output

TestAccAwsWafv2RegexPatternSet_Tags: resource_aws_wafv2_regex_pattern_set_test.go:164: Step 1/4 error: terraform failed: exit status 1

        stderr:

        Error: Error creating WAFv2 RegexPatternSet: WAFLimitsExceededException: AWS WAF couldn’t perform the operation because you exceeded your resource limit.

--- FAIL: TestAccAwsWafv2RegexPatternSet_Tags (16.47s)

Important Factoids

Max Number of regex sets per account per Region: 10
References

https://docs.aws.amazon.com/waf/latest/developerguide/limits.html

anGie44 commented 3 years ago

Duplicates https://github.com/terraform-providers/terraform-provider-aws/issues/15857 and closed by #15860

bflad commented 3 years ago

Oh sorry I missed this 😅

anGie44 commented 3 years ago

np @bflad ! thanks for the sweeper fix 💪

ghost commented 3 years ago

I'm going to lock this issue because it has been closed for 30 days ⏳. This helps our maintainers find and focus on the active issues.

If you feel this issue should be reopened, we encourage creating a new issue linking back to this one for added context. Thanks!