hashicorp / terraform-provider-aws

The AWS Provider enables Terraform to manage AWS resources.
https://registry.terraform.io/providers/hashicorp/aws
Mozilla Public License 2.0
9.74k stars 9.1k forks source link

AppStream Elastic fleets #22587

Open Shkarlatov opened 2 years ago

Shkarlatov commented 2 years ago

Community Note

Description

New or Affected Resource(s)

Potential Terraform Configuration

References

Shkarlatov commented 2 years ago

There is a ready-made implementation in another provider https://github.com/hashicorp/terraform-provider-awscc

Need change impl aws_appstream_fleet to allow elastic fleets. Many parameters are marked Required, but when use elastic fleets its not needed (https://docs.aws.amazon.com/appstream2/latest/APIReference/API_CreateFleet.html)

greasy-weasel commented 2 years ago

Hi,

I've submitted PR #22830.

Still working this through as I'm new to go. Seemed a fairly simple change to make to facilitate Shkarlatov ideas.

Fork is here: https://github.com/gbarford/terraform-provider-aws/tree/appstream_elastic_fleet under appstream_elastic_fleet branch.

Regards

Giles

meijason commented 2 years ago

All, We are planning to use Terraform provisioning AWS AppStream Elastic Fleet. The current Terraform AWS Provider(4.3.0) does not support Elastic Fleet. Can someone provide a timeline when Elastic Fleet will be supported in future version AWS Provider?

Thanks. -Jason

maati55 commented 2 years ago

Any plan to add Elastic Fleet option to the Terraform Provider for AWS?

PatriQ1414 commented 2 years ago

I found a great workaround for this, and it works seamlessly

Appstream-Elastic-Fleet-Terraform

dylanl321 commented 1 year ago

I would love to see movement on this without needing a separate Cloudformation Stack to run. Any idea on the status?

jrstarke commented 1 year ago

For anyone that's interested in this, be sure to go to the @gbarford's PR (https://github.com/hashicorp/terraform-provider-aws/pull/22830) and add a 👍

The maintainers have a limited amount of resources, and so they review based on what the most people are interested in, usually ranked by 👍 . Looking at the PR for this functionality, it's 4 pages down on the pull requests, so I wouldn't expect it reviewed soon unless it gets some more upvotes.

erik-h commented 2 months ago

22830 has been closed :(